Creating Student Workshops on Media Literacy: From Soda Claims to Streaming Metrics

Hook: Students overwhelmed by claims and numbers? Teach them one toolkit to handle both.

Teachers and lifelong learners are drowning in two parallel problems: flashy consumer claims ("prebiotic soda is gut-healthy!") and dazzling platform statistics ("99 million viewers! 450M MAUs!"). Both can mislead when students lack the tools to interrogate evidence. This workshop plan shows how to use the same evidence-based methods—source evaluation, basic statistics, triangulation and data visualization—to teach media literacy and data literacy across subjects.

Why this matters in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 accelerated two trends that make this workshop urgent: mainstream soda brands launched or acquired "healthy" soda lines (prebiotic sodas became a mass-market category), and global streaming platforms reported record engagement tied to major live events. At the same time, platforms and brands increasingly craft narratives with selective metrics. Regulators and independent auditors are pressing for more transparency, and AI—both a tool and a blurrier of truth—has amplified the speed and scale of claims. Teachers should be comfortable linking claims to industry discussions such as media and brand architecture debates and platform measurement critiques.

Students need cross-curricular skills to answer the same question across domains: "How trustworthy is this number or claim?"—and to know where to look for corroborating information (for example, public company dashboards discussed in cross-platform workflows analyses).

Workshop goals and outcomes

• Learning goal: Students will evaluate consumer health claims and streaming metrics using a consistent critical framework.
• Skills developed: source evaluation, basic statistics (mean, median, sample size, margin of error), data visualization, evidence synthesis, persuasive communication.
• Outcomes: A group evidence brief and an infographic/video that explains whether a claim stands up to scrutiny.

Target audience and alignment

This plan is adaptable for middle- and high-school classes, college seminars, after-school programs, or teacher professional development. It maps easily to health education, math/statistics, media studies, and computer science competencies. For classroom tech workflows and production notes, consider examples from the Hybrid Micro-Studio Playbook to see how content measurement and distribution pipelines shape the numbers students read.

Why use two case studies together?

Consumer claims about "healthy" sodas and platform streaming statistics both rely on selective presentation of evidence. By teaching them together you:

• Expose common rhetorical strategies (framing, selective averages, cherry-picked endpoints).
• Show that evidence evaluation tools transfer across domains.
• Make learning engaging—students relate to both a beverage they might buy and content they stream.

Workshop structure: 4 sessions (90 minutes each)

Session 1 — Foundations: Claim, Context, and Sources

Objective: Teach a repeatable checklist for assessing claims.

1. Introduce the framework: Claim — Evidence — Source — Context — Counterevidence.
2. Warm-up activity (15 min): Show three ads/headlines—one soda claim, one streaming headline (e.g., "Record 99M viewers"), one neutral report. Students first write the claim in one sentence.
3. Mini-lesson (20 min): How to evaluate sources—authority, purpose, evidence type (peer-reviewed vs. marketing vs. press release), conflicts of interest. Demonstrate with a nutrition study vs. a company press release and link students to resources on finding funding disclosures from casework such as lab-focused analyses.
4. Group practice (40 min): Teams map sources for a chosen soda brand and a streaming headline. Use a simple matrix: Source | Type | Evidence | Conflict | Confidence (low/med/high).

Session 2 — Reading Numbers: Basic Data Literacy

Objective: Learn to read common metrics and detect misleading uses of averages and percentages.

1. Direct instruction (20 min): Key streaming metrics explained—views, unique viewers, MAU/DAU, concurrent viewers, average watch time, engagement rate, completion rate. Key health metrics—serving size, grams of sugar, prebiotic grams, clinical endpoints, sample size, p-values, confidence intervals.
2. Interactive demo (25 min): Show how the same trick can mislead: a "50% reduction in sugar per serving" (but serving size halved) vs. "50% increase in viewers" (but moving from 2 to 3 views per user). Students calculate and interpret small data examples in Google Sheets; instructors can point to real-world measurement debates in cross-platform content workflows.
3. Practice (45 min): Each team receives two short datasets—one nutrition label set and one simplified streaming report. Tasks: compute mean/median, find misleading averages, create one chart that clarifies the truth. For hands-on examples of independent third-party metrics to triangulate platform claims, review summaries from industry measurement discussions (Nielsen/Comscore) and companion analyses such as livestream game engagement write-ups that show how different measures tell different stories.

Session 3 — Triangulation and Contextual Research

Objective: Teach triangulation—cross-checking claims with independent sources.

1. Mini-lecture (15 min): Why triangulation matters—examples from 2025/26 where brand claims or platform numbers were later revised or recontextualized. Use media-architecture critiques such as mapping opaque buys to outcomes as a framework for understanding how numbers can be structured to produce narratives.
2. Tools overview (20 min): Reliable sources for nutrition (PubMed, FDA, EFSA), fact-checkers, third-party analytics for streaming (Nielsen, Comscore, Conviva), academic databases, and how to query platform public dashboards and press releases. Show how to find study funding disclosures. For an example of lab-to-public research workflows, point students to biotech-to-consumer case studies like From Lab to Table.
3. Group research (55 min): Teams verify a soda brand's health claims (e.g., prebiotic benefits) and a streaming headline (e.g., "record viewers" for a sporting final). Each team builds a 1-page evidence brief with citations and a confidence rating; consider incorporating guidance from LLM-assisted research workflows that emphasize source verification rather than blind reliance on generated summaries.

Session 4 — Synthesis and Communication

Objective: Students create an evidence-based communication product and reflect on the process.

1. Final project (60 min): Teams produce either a two-minute explainer video or a one-page infographic that answers: "Is the claim accurate? What does the data actually show? What should consumers/viewers know?" Use templates and story-led content pipelines like creator commerce story‑led workflows as examples for structuring the final piece.
2. Presentations (20 min): Quick 4–5 minute presentations and peer feedback using a rubric.
3. Reflection (10 min): Class discussion on transferability—how would you use this framework next time you see a product claim or a platform stat?

Detailed materials and datasets

Use real-but-sanitized materials so students practice with authentic language and numbers without copyright concerns.

• Nutrition packet: product labels (ingredient lists and Nutrition Facts), one small clinical study abstract, company press release claiming "supports gut health" and an independent consumer complaint or lawsuit summary (public records exist for several brands). For examples of lab methods and critique, see applied-lab writeups like From Lab to Table.
• Streaming packet: a press release claiming record viewers, a public monthly active user (MAU) figure from a company earnings report (example: a streaming platform reported 450M MAUs in late 2025), and a third-party report showing a different metric (e.g., unique digital viewers for a specific event). Contextual discussions in cross-platform workflow analyses help students understand platform incentives behind metrics.
• Worksheets: Source matrix template, evidence brief template, rubric for final product, glossary of key metrics.
• Tools: Google Sheets, simple charting (Sheets/Excel), optional Python notebook for advanced classes (pandas + matplotlib), and free visualization tools (Datawrapper, Flourish). For production and distribution context, review the Hybrid Micro-Studio Playbook.

Assessment rubrics and sample prompts

Assess both skills and thinking. Use the following criteria for group products:

• Evidence quality (30%): Did the team cite independent sources and assess conflicts of interest?
• Data interpretation (30%): Were basic statistics computed correctly? Was the visualization honest and clarifying?
• Clarity of communication (20%): Can a non-expert understand the conclusion and reasoning?
• Transferability (20%): Did students describe how to apply the framework to other claims?

Classroom adaptations and differentiation

Shorten sessions to 45 minutes for regular periods. For younger students, focus on source evaluation and simple charts. For advanced learners, add a mini-unit on sampling bias, statistical significance, and API data pulls from public dashboards—students interested in data pipelines may benefit from reviewing modular production/playbook resources like the Hybrid Micro-Studio Playbook.

Practical teaching tips

• Prepare datasets ahead to avoid time wasted on data wrangling.
• Model skepticism without cynicism—emphasize that most claims have a kernel of truth and the goal is clearer truth, not debunking for show.
• Encourage students to record where they feel uncertain—metacognition builds better critical thinkers.
• Use real-world deadlines (e.g., analyze a live streaming event or a new product launch) to raise engagement; consider how micro-subscription and live-drop business models (coverage in platform debates) influence headline incentives.

Case study 1 — Prebiotic sodas and the language of health

In 2025 large beverage companies increased investment in prebiotic sodas and other "healthy" alternatives. Marketing highlights reduced sugar, added prebiotic fiber, and gut health language. But the scientific evidence about long-term health outcomes for these beverages remains mixed.

Students should ask:

• Who funded the study cited (company vs. independent)?
• What is the actual dose of prebiotic fibers per serving and how does it compare to doses tested in clinical trials?
• Is the claim about a biomarker (e.g., increased short-chain fatty acids) or a clinical outcome (reduced IBS symptoms)?
• Are there conflicts of interest like acquisition or brand partnerships?

Example classroom finding: A company press release claims "supports gut health" based on a study showing minor microbiome shifts over two weeks. Students learn this is a limited endpoint and should demand independent replication and clinically meaningful outcomes; for methods of evaluating lab claims and traceability, see applied-lab critiques such as From Lab to Table.

Case study 2 — Streaming metrics and headline inflation

In early 2026 a major platform reported record engagement for a sporting final and high MAUs. Headlines about "99 million viewers" are attention-grabbing, but what do those numbers mean?

Questions to teach students:

• Is "viewers" measuring concurrent viewers, unique viewers, or cumulative views across platforms?
• Are numbers inflated by short, repeat views or autoplay counts?
• How do paid promotions and partner streams affect reported totals?
• What third-party measurement corroborates the platform's claim?

Example classroom finding: A platform counts "digital viewers" across multiple streams and includes short passive streams. Triangulation with an independent measurement firm shows a different engagement profile—students practice explaining this clearly, referencing third-party measurement critiques and industry workflows such as stream engagement write-ups and cross-platform analyses.

Teach students to ask not just "Is this true?" but "True in what way, for whom, and under what conditions?"

Advanced modules and future-facing skills (2026+)

As platforms and brands adopt more sophisticated tech in 2026—AI-generated content, synthesized viewer metrics, or synthetic sample augmentation—students benefit from advanced modules:

• Detecting synthetic or bot-driven engagement: basic traffic forensics and anomaly detection in time-series data; follow industry platform-war analysis such as Platform Wars to see examples of bot and synthetic engagement issues.
• Using LLMs responsibly for research: prompt to retrieve sources, then verify with primary documents and versioning practices from governance playbooks like Versioning Prompts and Models.
• Ethics and privacy: how platform measurement intersects with user privacy and how to read privacy policies—pair lessons with the Data Sovereignty Checklist.
• Understanding regulatory shifts: discuss recent moves by consumer protection agencies and industry standards pushing for measurement transparency and how they map to media architecture critiques like Principal Media and Brand Architecture.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Avoid overreliance on headlines—always follow to the primary source.
• Don't assume scientific language equals rigor—check methodology and sample size.
• Be wary of absolute statements—marketing often omits caveats and context.
• Teach students to use multiple metrics: a single number rarely tells the whole story. For classroom-ready examples of how multiple metrics can change a narrative, see creator and distribution analyses such as cross-platform workflows and production playbooks like the Hybrid Micro-Studio Playbook.

Teacher-ready resources and templates

Include in your packet:

• Source evaluation checklist (one-page).
• Evidence brief template (one page).
• Simple datasets for both case studies in CSV.
• Grading rubric and peer-review sheet.
• Links to reliable databases: PubMed, FDA, Nielsen/Comscore summaries, and public company investor pages. For connections between lab methods and consumer claims consult applied biotech analysis like From Lab to Table.

Measuring impact and follow-up

Assess outcomes with pre/post surveys on confidence and a short skills test that asks students to evaluate a new claim. Track artifacts—the evidence briefs and infographics—for portfolio inclusion. Consider a cross-school showcase where teams present to a panel of community judges (teacher, local journalist, data scientist). If you want students to understand downstream production and measurement incentives, supplement with readings on hybrid production and distribution dynamics.

Final actionable checklist for teachers (ready to use)

1. Download/create a one-page source matrix template.
2. Pick two current claims (one product, one platform) and gather primary documents—labels, press release, study abstract, third-party report.
3. Run Session 1 in a single period: introduce framework and source-mapping exercise.
4. Use Session 2 to teach one or two basic stats and have students create a clarifying chart.
5. Assign the evidence brief as the deliverable with rubric and peer review.

Closing: The transferable habit to teach

In 2026, both marketers and platform engineers will keep inventing new ways to make numbers and words feel persuasive. The single most valuable habit you can teach students is a structured skepticism: ask for the evidence, evaluate the source, compute a simple sanity check, and triangulate. That habit turns confusing claims—about beverages, streaming, or any consumer technology—into teachable data moments. For instructors wanting to expand into production-aware lessons, consider pairing this unit with creator workflow and measurement resources such as Hybrid Micro-Studio and cross-platform case studies like Cross-Platform Content Workflows.

Call to action

Ready to run this cross-curricular workshop? Download the free lesson packet (templates, datasets, and rubrics) or sign up for a live teacher-training session. Equip your students with the media literacy and data literacy skills they'll use for life—because in 2026 the ability to read numbers and claims is as essential as reading a paragraph.

Related Reading

• Cross-Platform Content Workflows: How BBC’s YouTube Deal Should Inform Creator Distribution
• From Prompt to Publish: An Implementation Guide for Using Gemini Guided Learning
• Data Sovereignty Checklist for Multinational CRMs
• Principal Media and Brand Architecture: Mapping Opaque Buys to Transparent Domain Outcomes
• Online Negativity and Mental Health: What Hollywood’s Burnout Teaches Families of Incarcerated People
• Mobile Workstation for Vacation Rentals: Bringing an M4 Mac mini on Longer Hotel Stays
• DIY: Modifying an E-Scooter for Paddock Use Without Voiding Warranties
• From Stove to Scale: How a DIY Mindset Can Help You Make Keto Pantry Staples
• Build a Low‑Carb Pantry Like a Small‑Batch Foodmaker